Home | I want to volunteer | List of Courses |  FAQs | Discussion (Chinese)

physics3-3


Transcriber:OOPS SJTU: 武瑞, Fly
Brief Bio:

Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

wurui866@sjtu.edu.cn
flycao1985@hotmail.com

Timecode:OOPS SJTU: Shelley
Brief Bio:Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

jinxialu@hotmail.com
Proofreader:OOPS SJTU: Rodman 
Brief Bio:Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

rodmantang@hotmail.com
Date finished:

10/19/2005

 


1
00:00:24,840 --> 00:00:30,290
We have discussed free oscillations, harmonic oscillators without damping,

2
00:00:30,290 --> 00:00:32,760
and then we introduce damping.

3
00:00:32,760 --> 00:00:38,150
But in each of those cases, we let the simple harm-oscillator do its own thing

4
00:00:38,150 --> 00:00:41,500
We did not interfere with it.

5
00:00:41,500 --> 00:00:44,790
Today that's going to change.

6
00:00:44,790 --> 00:00:51,400
Today we are going to impose our will onto the simple harmonic oscillator.

7
00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:58,600
And we can impose our will on it by driving it with a force.

8
00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,800
And then see what the net result is.

9
00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:05,330
And let's start with a simple examle

10
00:01:05,330 --> 00:01:10,810
that I have here a spring with spring constant k.

11
00:01:10,810 --> 00:01:14,400
And an object mass m.

12
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:18,930
And this be equilibrium position x equal zero.

13
00:01:18,930 --> 00:01:20,610
There will be damping.

14
00:01:20,610 --> 00:01:27,690
I will introduce again b/m equals γ and ω zero squared equals k/m.

15
00:01:27,690 --> 00:01:32,150
We've seen this before this is the shorthand notation.

16
00:01:32,150 --> 00:01:37,840
So now in addition to the fact that when the object is away from equilibrium,

17
00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:40,820
that there's here a spring force.

18
00:01:40,820 --> 00:01:44,480
I am now going to apply on that object a force.

19
00:01:44,480 --> 00:01:47,700
May not be easy to do we'll get back to that how we do that.

20
00:01:47,700 --> 00:01:50,110
But I can apply a force on that.

21
00:01:50,110 --> 00:01:53,660
Maybe through magnetic fields. Maybe through electric fields.

22
00:01:53,660 --> 00:02:01,840
And I'm going to, this force is now going to have the character F zero times cosωt.

23
00:02:01,840 --> 00:02:06,620
I impose on that system now that frequency ω,

24
00:02:06,620 --> 00:02:10,840
and I can choose that anything I want to.

25
00:02:10,840 --> 00:02:15,650
So now I can write down the differential equation of motion.

26
00:02:15,650 --> 00:02:22,980
Newton's second law (see the blackboard). Nothing new.

27
00:02:22,980 --> 00:02:24,600
That's the spring force.

28
00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:28,660
Minus b x dot. Nothing new. That's the damping.

29
00:02:28,660 --> 00:02:39,410
But now comes this external force F zero cosωt.

30
00:02:39,410 --> 00:02:42,720
What I'm going to now? I'm going to move this to the complex plane.

31
00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:46,530
Not that that is absolutely necessary but I'm so used to that.

32
00:02:46,530 --> 00:02:49,860
So I'm going to write this now in terms of Z.

33
00:02:49,860 --> 00:02:55,000
And then we take the real part of Z later then this is back, goes back to x.

34
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:58,440
So I'm going to write this now in terms of Z double dot.

35
00:02:58,440 --> 00:03:00,480
I divide m out.

36
00:03:00,480 --> 00:03:13,640
We got plus γ Z dot plus ω zero squared times Z,

37
00:03:13,640 --> 00:03:17,220
and that now becomes F zero divided by m.

38
00:03:17,220 --> 00:03:19,420
Remember I divided m out.

39
00:03:19,420 --> 00:03:26,700
And then we get cosωt for which I will write e to the power jwt

40
00:03:26,700 --> 00:03:29,230
because I work now in the complex plane.

41
00:03:29,230 --> 00:03:35,160
And through Euler, I can always convert that back to cosine.

42
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:39,210
My trial function for Z,

43
00:03:39,210 --> 00:03:50,840
which is a complex notation, is some amplitude times e to the power jwt minus δ.

44
00:03:50,840 --> 00:04:00,750
Now crucial is that you understand why this ω and this ω are the same.

45
00:04:00,750 --> 00:04:08,350
This is the ω of my driving the system that is my will that I impose on that system.

46
00:04:08,350 --> 00:04:12,520
Clearly given enough time and in the beginning the system may be unhappy

47
00:04:12,520 --> 00:04:15,460
and it may do all kinds of nasty things

48
00:04:15,460 --> 00:04:17,390
which we will discuss next lecture.

49
00:04:17,390 --> 00:04:20,310
But ultimately I will come out to be the winner

50
00:04:20,310 --> 00:04:27,320
and ultimately that system is bound to start oscillating with the frequency that I imposed on it.

51
00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:32,110
If I start shaking you, in the beginning you may not like that, then you may oppose to that.

52
00:04:32,110 --> 00:04:34,200
But ultimately I will be the winner.

53
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,730
And I will make you shake with that frequency ω.

54
00:04:36,730 --> 00:04:44,750
So clearly the ultimate solution must have the same ω as the driver.

55
00:04:44,750 --> 00:04:47,230
What's the meaning of this δ?

56
00:04:47,230 --> 00:04:55,800
Well, it is not so obvious that the object will have been in the same phase as the driver.

57
00:04:55,800 --> 00:04:59,470
It is possible that when the force is pointing in this direction,

58
00:04:59,470 --> 00:05:01,690
that the object may be going in the other direction.

59
00:05:01,690 --> 00:05:04,170
And you will see that. That indeed can happen.

60
00:05:04,170 --> 00:05:09,650
And so this δ is a phase angle which takes into account the possibilty

61
00:05:09,650 --> 00:05:18,820
that the driver and the object in their motion are not exactly inphase.

62
00:05:18,820 --> 00:05:22,100
We call this solution a steady state solution.

63
00:05:22,100 --> 00:05:27,880
Steady state that you must wait long enough for the system not to fight you any longer.

64
00:05:27,880 --> 00:05:31,130
That will be part of my next lecture: The fighting issue.

65
00:05:31,130 --> 00:05:38,460
This is when I ultimately come out to be the winner and when the system follows my will.

66
00:05:38,460 --> 00:05:42,410
So now I am going to take the second derivative.

67
00:05:42,410 --> 00:05:47,220
So I get minus ω squared. jw comes out twice.

68
00:05:47,220 --> 00:05:49,490
So I get minus ω squared.

69
00:05:49,490 --> 00:05:53,820
Then I get plus γjw.

70
00:05:53,820 --> 00:05:57,890
Then I get plus ω zero squared.

71
00:05:57,890 --> 00:06:06,350
And that whole thing multiplied by A to the power e jwt minus δ

72
00:06:06,350 --> 00:06:14,030
that now equals F zero divided by m times e to the power jwt.

73
00:06:14,030 --> 00:06:17,130
So the whole thing is now in the complex plane.

74
00:06:17,130 --> 00:06:22,800
And you see the e to the power jwt cancels on both sides.

75
00:06:22,800 --> 00:06:31,440
So I lose my e to the power jwt and I'm going to multiply both sides by e to the power j plus δ.

76
00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:35,520
So I lose my δ here but it appears then here.

77
00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:40,070
And so if I make that simple change, algebraic change.

78
00:06:40,070 --> 00:06:50,680
We are going to get (see the blackboard)

79
00:06:50,680 --> 00:07:00,360
that multiplied by A must now be equal F zero divided by m times e to the power jδ.

80
00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:02,250
ωt is gone.

81
00:07:02,250 --> 00:07:06,720
And I've moved the δ to the right side.

82
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:09,120
Can we live with that?

83
00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:20,720
And this can be written (see the blackboard).

84
00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:24,880
I'm still in the complex plane but that's Euler.

85
00:07:24,880 --> 00:07:32,540
Now let's compare the apples with apples and the oranged with oranges.

86
00:07:32,540 --> 00:07:38,120
This is an apple and this is an apple that means it's real.

87
00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:41,910
And that means this is an apple.

88
00:07:41,910 --> 00:07:44,050
But there are also oranges.

89
00:07:44,050 --> 00:07:49,450
This is an orange has a j and this is an orange that has a j.

90
00:07:49,450 --> 00:07:55,230
And so for this equation to always hold at all moments in time.

91
00:07:55,230 --> 00:08:00,180
The apples must be equal to the apples on this side.

92
00:08:00,180 --> 00:08:04,450
And the oranges on this side must be equal to the oranges on that side.

93
00:08:04,450 --> 00:08:09,950
So it looks like one equation but it really is two equations.

94
00:08:09,950 --> 00:08:28,610
So we now get that (see the blackboard)

95
00:08:28,610 --> 00:08:32,240
Apples on both sides are equal.

96
00:08:32,240 --> 00:08:34,500
And now we get the oranges on both sides.

97
00:08:34,500 --> 00:08:57,690
(see the blackboard)

98
00:08:57,690 --> 00:09:02,970
Two equations with two unknows, A as unknown and δ as unknown.

99
00:09:02,970 --> 00:09:05,090
And they are easy to solve.

100
00:09:05,090 --> 00:09:09,100
If you square them, then you get sin squared δ

101
00:09:09,100 --> 00:09:13,080
and cosine squared δ and you add them up. That's one.

102
00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:17,700
And so that immediately gives you then what A is.

103
00:09:17,700 --> 00:09:40,430
So A is going to be (see the blackboard)

104
00:09:40,430 --> 00:09:44,840
So this is the amplitude of the object.

105
00:09:44,840 --> 00:09:48,180
I will massage that we will talk about this word at least in next ten minutes.

106
00:09:48,180 --> 00:09:51,090
It's a very complicated funtion.

107
00:09:51,090 --> 00:09:56,080
We want to see through that equation what that actually means.

108
00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:02,340
And tangent of δ is easy to find because you divide this equation by that one,

109
00:10:02,340 --> 00:10:07,990
you get immediately the tangent of δ. A disappears and F zero over m disappears.

110
00:10:07,990 --> 00:10:22,300
And so you get that tangent of that angle δ is (see the blackboard).

111
00:10:22,300 --> 00:10:25,860
We can now return to the real world.

112
00:10:25,860 --> 00:10:31,770
And if we return to the real world, we have to change x and Z back into x.

113
00:10:31,770 --> 00:10:37,400
And so our final solution which I will put in color will then be

114
00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:47,990
that x as a funcion of t is (see the blackboard)

115
00:10:47,990 --> 00:10:58,350
And that is the ω. That's my will that I impose on the system.

116
00:10:58,350 --> 00:11:07,120
Notice that there I know two adjustable constants which we were so used to in the past.

117
00:11:07,120 --> 00:11:10,730
In the past we said that well you can start the system at t equals zero.

118
00:11:10,730 --> 00:11:14,750
You can define the position. You can give it certain velocity.

119
00:11:14,750 --> 00:11:20,330
So you always expect that in your solution there are two adjustables

120
00:11:20,330 --> 00:11:24,700
in order to meet the initial conditions.

121
00:11:24,700 --> 00:11:27,470
There are none here.

122
00:11:27,470 --> 00:11:33,060
And the reason for that is that this is a steady state solution

123
00:11:33,060 --> 00:11:39,320
which means the system doesn't even remember anymore what the situation was at t equals zero.

124
00:11:39,320 --> 00:11:42,250
It has lost all its memory.

125
00:11:42,250 --> 00:11:48,950
And so A which is the amplitude of that object is not, not something that you may choose.

126
00:11:48,950 --> 00:11:54,140
A follows immediately from this equation which is a complex function,

127
00:11:54,140 --> 00:11:58,850
ω, ω zero F zero and so on.

128
00:11:58,850 --> 00:12:01,420
And δ is also non-negotiable.

129
00:12:01,420 --> 00:12:04,140
δ has nothing to do with your initial conditions.

130
00:12:04,140 --> 00:12:09,750
δ follows from γ, ω and ω zero.

131
00:12:09,750 --> 00:12:15,530
So now we are going to look at and try to understand the complexity of the amplitude.

132
00:12:15,530 --> 00:12:19,240
For one thing it is pleasing that F zero was upstairs.

133
00:12:19,240 --> 00:12:26,260
It is intuitively pleasing that if the force that you apply becomes larger that the amplitude will become larger.

134
00:12:26,260 --> 00:12:27,740
That's reasonable.

135
00:12:27,740 --> 00:12:31,800
It is also pleasing to see that it has a γ here downstairs.

136
00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:37,590
That means if there is a huge amount of damping, you don't expect A to be very large.

137
00:12:37,590 --> 00:12:44,890
So that's also pleasing that you see a γ downstairs.

138
00:12:44,890 --> 00:12:56,090
Now I want to evaluate in detail what is hidden in this very difficult equation.

139
00:12:56,090 --> 00:13:03,290
And let me try out your intuition, common sense.

140
00:13:03,290 --> 00:13:09,270
without looking at my solutions, without looking at differential equations,

141
00:13:09,270 --> 00:13:13,600
without looking at equation A.

142
00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:15,960
Just common sense now.

143
00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:20,100
Suppose I apply a force here on this object.

144
00:13:20,100 --> 00:13:23,710
with a frequency which is near zero.

145
00:13:23,710 --> 00:13:28,750
So it takes a hundred million years for it to reach its maximum.

146
00:13:28,750 --> 00:13:35,080
And then it takes another hundred million years for the force to go to zero and so on.

147
00:13:35,080 --> 00:13:44,830
When that force has a value F zero, what do you think will be the position of that object?

148
00:13:44,830 --> 00:13:48,940
If you know that position, that may tell you what A is,

149
00:13:48,940 --> 00:13:52,000
what the amplitude is of that object,

150
00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,850
without any differetial equations.

151
00:13:54,850 --> 00:14:01,580
Anyone of you able to immediately say, of course, A has to be this.

152
00:14:01,580 --> 00:14:04,020
Maybe that is a little tougher. I see some hands there, I know.

153
00:14:04,020 --> 00:14:07,380
Or you're just doing your hear.

154
00:14:07,380 --> 00:14:16,060
Yeah! Of course.

155
00:14:16,060 --> 00:14:22,350
If that force goes so slowly that all moments in time there must be equilibrium,

156
00:14:22,350 --> 00:14:29,720
which means the spring force, which is of course kx and the force that you apply which is your F.

157
00:14:29,720 --> 00:14:36,210
And so if you do it extremely slowly, the two must always cancel each other.

158
00:14:36,210 --> 00:14:40,710
And so I make the prediction now that when ω goes to zero

159
00:14:40,710 --> 00:14:45,830
that A should become F zero divided by k.

160
00:14:45,830 --> 00:14:48,190
That is that x.

161
00:14:48,190 --> 00:14:52,060
Now let's look at this equation, let's see whether that is true.

162
00:14:52,060 --> 00:14:57,890
We make ω zero. We make ω zero. So this equation tells us

163
00:14:57,890 --> 00:15:05,570
that this F zero divided by m and then downstairs we have ω zero squared.

164
00:15:05,570 --> 00:15:08,740
But ω zero squared is k/m.

165
00:15:08,740 --> 00:15:13,030
And you see indeed so that's exactly what you get.

166
00:15:13,030 --> 00:15:17,410
Now without looking at the equations,

167
00:15:17,410 --> 00:15:24,010
can you guess what the phase difference is between the driver and the follower?

168
00:15:24,010 --> 00:15:29,330
If it takes a hundred million years for that force to slowly reach its maximum,

169
00:15:29,330 --> 00:15:31,000
and a hundred million years to go back again.

170
00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:36,020
What do you think will be the phase difference between the two?

171
00:15:36,020 --> 00:15:40,030
It will be zero, of course. Plenty of time for that object to follow.

172
00:15:40,030 --> 00:15:44,050
So you expect that δ becomes zero.

173
00:15:44,050 --> 00:15:53,190
Well, if ω becomes zero, this ω this zero is ω squared.

174
00:15:53,190 --> 00:15:59,160
This is...So this goes away. Here is a zero upstairs so you see the tangent of δ is zero.

175
00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:01,010
And that indeed is what you see.

176
00:16:01,010 --> 00:16:06,720
So the two follow each other. It's extremely boring the whole thing to watch

177
00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:11,450
and the amplitude is exactly what you predicted.

178
00:16:11,450 --> 00:16:15,430
Let's now do something more interesting.

179
00:16:15,430 --> 00:16:20,380
And let us drive it at what we call the resonance frequency. We give it that word.

180
00:16:20,380 --> 00:16:24,840
That's the frequency that the system really would love to oscillate

181
00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:33,720
in the absence of any damping and in the absence of my doing the silly thing by driving it.

182
00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:35,840
So now we are at what we call at resonance.

183
00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:41,040
So this term goes away and this term now becomes ω0γ.

184
00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:55,750
So you now get that (see the blackboard).

185
00:16:55,750 --> 00:17:01,770
Well, if you remeber that we introduce a quailty factor ω0 divided by γ,

186
00:17:01,770 --> 00:17:04,700
which is a dimensionless number.

187
00:17:04,700 --> 00:17:11,200
Then you can also write this as (see the blackboard).

188
00:17:11,200 --> 00:17:18,170
So that's nice to remember that at resonance, if you define this as resonance,

189
00:17:18,170 --> 00:17:25,820
the amplitude of the object is Q times higher than what it would be at extremely low frequency.

190
00:17:25,820 --> 00:17:31,490
Interesting to remember. So this is the amplitude at very low frequency

191
00:17:31,490 --> 00:17:36,550
and when you drive it at resonance, it is Q times higher.

192
00:17:36,550 --> 00:17:42,740
And then I will put that here. When ω goes to infinity,

193
00:17:42,740 --> 00:17:49,130
everything goes so fast that the object has no time to follow the driver.

194
00:17:49,130 --> 00:17:54,030
The object goes nuts because this high frequency. It can't do anything.

195
00:17:54,030 --> 00:18:00,780
And so A would then go to zero. And let's check that.

196
00:18:00,780 --> 00:18:05,210
If ω goes to infinity, you see the downstairs here goes to infinity.

197
00:18:05,210 --> 00:18:09,900
So A goes indeed into zero. So you have no amplitude at all.

198
00:18:09,900 --> 00:18:14,880
What is not so obvious that δ here is π.

199
00:18:14,880 --> 00:18:17,170
And what is not so obvious here either,

200
00:18:17,170 --> 00:18:21,690
that δ goes to π/2 in case of resonance.

201
00:18:21,690 --> 00:18:27,860
In other words, at resonance the driver and the follower are 90 degrees out of phase.

202
00:18:27,860 --> 00:18:30,790
The follower is 90 degrees behind.

203
00:18:30,790 --> 00:18:34,400
Very hard to imagine what that is like. But I will demonstrate it.

204
00:18:34,400 --> 00:18:36,630
You will be able to see it.

205
00:18:36,630 --> 00:18:43,070
What it means here that at very high frequencies, the amplitude of the object goes to zero.

206
00:18:43,070 --> 00:18:46,620
But what I will be able to show you that if the driver goes

207
00:18:46,620 --> 00:18:49,470
in this direction that the object goes in this direction.

208
00:18:49,470 --> 00:18:53,130
So they are 180 degrees out of phase that I can show you.

209
00:18:53,130 --> 00:18:58,640
That's what it means when δ equals π.

210
00:18:58,640 --> 00:19:09,650
So now we can make a graph, a plot of A as a function of ω.

211
00:19:12,380 --> 00:19:16,390
So here is ω and here is A.

212
00:19:16,390 --> 00:19:30,130
And then this be the resonance frequency ω0. ω a little straighter.

213
00:19:30,130 --> 00:19:33,670
So you start at very low frequency. This is zero.

214
00:19:33,670 --> 00:19:37,430
We start here with F0 divided by K.

215
00:19:37,430 --> 00:19:42,860
We all agree that this was obvious. And then the amplitude will build up.

216
00:19:42,860 --> 00:19:49,750
Goes through a maximum, goes down and ultimately goes to zero.

217
00:19:49,750 --> 00:20:00,530
And at this value ω0, this value is Q times F0 divided by K.

218
00:20:00,530 --> 00:20:05,020
Now for those of you who look very carefully

219
00:20:05,020 --> 00:20:13,520
You may have noticed that the maximum here that I have drawn is not at ω equals ω0.

220
00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:21,730
which may go against to instinct. This maximum occurs at a frequency which

221
00:20:21,730 --> 00:20:29,810
we will call ωmax which is always a little bit below ω0 but for high Q systems

222
00:20:29,810 --> 00:20:31,830
as I will show you shortly.

223
00:20:31,830 --> 00:20:41,620
It is effectively the same. I will come back to this.

224
00:20:41,620 --> 00:20:53,320
The δ in phase as a function of ω. This is π and this is π/2

225
00:20:53,320 --> 00:21:03,740
and this is ω0. Then that δ will change in the following way

226
00:21:03,740 --> 00:21:07,360
which is a way hard to imagine that then what A is doing.

227
00:21:07,360 --> 00:21:13,970
You are inphase at very low frequencies. At resonance precisely at ω0

228
00:21:13,970 --> 00:21:17,790
you have the π/2, 90 degrees out of phase.

229
00:21:17,790 --> 00:21:21,430
And at very high frequencies, you will see that the two are out of phase

230
00:21:21,430 --> 00:21:26,680
and I will be able to demomstrate that to you.

231
00:21:26,680 --> 00:21:32,060
Coming back to this mysterious maximum, not so mysterious actually.

232
00:21:32,060 --> 00:21:38,380
Where is this? At what frequency do we have really the maximum amplitude?

233
00:21:38,380 --> 00:21:43,590
Well, to calculate that you would have to take the derivative of

234
00:21:43,590 --> 00:21:48,950
that the monstrous equation. You would have to take dA/dω.

235
00:21:48,950 --> 00:21:53,740
And you go, you ask that to be zero.

236
00:21:53,740 --> 00:21:56,050
So that's when the maximum occurs.

237
00:21:56,050 --> 00:22:00,050
And I will leave you with that exercise may take you a few minutes to do that.

238
00:22:00,050 --> 00:22:06,340
And you find then that ωmax.

239
00:22:06,340 --> 00:22:10,280
So where are the real maximum is located at the maximum in terms of

240
00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:22,480
the amplitude is (see the blackboard).

241
00:22:22,480 --> 00:22:25,130
Not so intuitive that it is there.

242
00:22:25,130 --> 00:22:29,480
And if you like to write that in terms of Q which is often done.

243
00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:37,860
Then ωmax so that is the frequency at which the amplitude reaches its maximum

244
00:22:37,860 --> 00:22:50,870
is (see the blackboard).

245
00:22:50,870 --> 00:22:54,600
And the reason why this is nice, you can immediately if you know Q,

246
00:22:54,600 --> 00:22:59,550
you can immediately evaluate it what the difference is percentage width

247
00:22:59,550 --> 00:23:05,100
between ωmax and ω0.

248
00:23:05,100 --> 00:23:13,100
If you want to know what the maximum amplitude itself is? So what Amax is?

249
00:23:13,100 --> 00:23:18,430
So that's really this value. It must be very close to Q times F0/Q(?K)

250
00:23:18,430 --> 00:23:20,350
but it is a little higher.

251
00:23:20,350 --> 00:23:26,250
Then you can write that in the following form and that's just

252
00:23:26,250 --> 00:23:32,930
a matter of algebraic manipulation. And you get Q here what you expect.

253
00:23:32,930 --> 00:23:45,660
And then downstair you get something like this (see the blackboard).

254
00:23:45,660 --> 00:23:53,590
And so now let's put in some numbers so that you get some feeling for the answers that we have.

255
00:23:53,590 --> 00:24:01,290
Suppose we have an example of a Q equals 5.

256
00:24:01,290 --> 00:24:03,140
Some modest value for Q.

257
00:24:03,140 --> 00:24:07,260
Most pendulums that we have, the Q is way higher than 5.

258
00:24:07,260 --> 00:24:14,030
So I take a modest number for Q. If I go to this equation here,

259
00:24:14,030 --> 00:24:21,030
2 squares 25, 2 times 25 is 50. That's 2% that I have to take the square root.

260
00:24:21,030 --> 00:24:23,410
So it's only 1% off.

261
00:24:23,410 --> 00:24:35,510
So ωmax divided by ω0 is 0.99. It's only one percent lower.

262
00:24:35,510 --> 00:24:38,840
It's only one percent below ω0.

263
00:24:38,840 --> 00:24:42,330
And then if you want to know now what Amax is.

264
00:24:42,330 --> 00:24:50,590
So you would think that Amax is very close to Q times F0/K,

265
00:24:50,590 --> 00:24:55,800
but it is not Q times. It is a little larger.

266
00:24:55,800 --> 00:25:03,310
And so if we defined Amax divided by A0. A0 now is meant to be the amplitude

267
00:25:03,310 --> 00:25:06,520
when ω equals 0, that is short hand notation.

268
00:25:06,520 --> 00:25:13,410
This number is not Q, a little higher, is now 5.03.

269
00:25:13,410 --> 00:25:18,320
And you can see it if Q is higher, then of course these numbers become

270
00:25:18,320 --> 00:25:23,610
even closer then ωmax becomes even closer to ω0.

271
00:25:23,610 --> 00:25:31,990
And then the maximum A becomes even closer to Q times F0/K.

272
00:25:31,990 --> 00:25:38,590
Rarely ever will we be bothered too much with the fact that the resonance frequency

273
00:25:38,590 --> 00:25:43,080
which we call ω0 is not exactly the frequency

274
00:25:43,080 --> 00:25:47,150
whereby the response of the object is a maximum.

275
00:25:47,150 --> 00:25:51,740
Very rarely ever will that become an issue.

276
00:25:51,740 --> 00:25:57,610
I want to show you now a transparency from your own book.

277
00:25:57,610 --> 00:26:03,440
Don't take notes. This is from French. You see here

278
00:26:03,440 --> 00:26:09,530
that the function, A but it is divided by A0 which is that F0 divided by K.

279
00:26:09,530 --> 00:26:16,590
So that is the amplitude for zero frequency. So when you start off its one.

280
00:26:16,590 --> 00:26:21,430
That ratio is one by definition, right? Because it's Aω divided by A0.

281
00:26:21,430 --> 00:26:25,170
And horizontally you see ω divdied ω0.

282
00:26:25,170 --> 00:26:29,660
So by definition, right here at the one sign is that point

283
00:26:29,660 --> 00:26:36,220
that I put ω0 there. And you see here these various curves

284
00:26:36,220 --> 00:26:42,150
for different values of Q, and the one that I made green is Q equals 10.

285
00:26:42,150 --> 00:26:46,570
And no surprise that height is at plus 10.

286
00:26:46,570 --> 00:26:53,000
Because we predicted that it's Q times higher than the amplitude when we have low frequency.

287
00:26:53,000 --> 00:26:57,620
And you see indeed that red one is very close to 10.

288
00:26:57,620 --> 00:27:03,530
If you look at the one that has a mark Q equals 3, which is this one.

289
00:27:03,530 --> 00:27:13,850
If you look very carefully, you may see that the maximum A shifted slightly below the value one,

290
00:27:13,850 --> 00:27:19,260
which is ω, ω is ω0. But even for Q equal 3,

291
00:27:19,260 --> 00:27:22,460
the difference is insignificantly small.

292
00:27:22,460 --> 00:27:28,540
And then at the bottom you see the δ function, the phase delay,

293
00:27:28,540 --> 00:27:33,970
the object follows the driver at very low frequency.

294
00:27:33,970 --> 00:27:40,320
Precisely, δ is zerp, at resonance is precisely π/2 90 degrees.

295
00:27:40,320 --> 00:27:43,960
Very hard to imagine but I will try to show it to you.

296
00:27:43,960 --> 00:27:47,710
And at very high frequencies, they go like this.

297
00:27:47,710 --> 00:27:54,830
They are 180 degrees out of phase.

298
00:27:54,830 --> 00:28:02,320
So now comes the question: how do you apply a force on a system.

299
00:28:02,320 --> 00:28:08,470
It's nice to say that is a force, but you have to think of a way that you can actually do that.

300
00:28:08,470 --> 00:28:12,150
And I will just discuss one case with you.

301
00:28:12,150 --> 00:28:15,650
And then I will try to demonstrate it also.

302
00:28:15,650 --> 00:28:22,960
If I have a pendulum and I want a force on this object.

303
00:28:22,960 --> 00:28:30,180
Then I can that as you will see in a indirect way by starting to move my hands here.

304
00:28:30,180 --> 00:28:35,360
You will see how that translate into a force on that object by moving my hands.

305
00:28:35,360 --> 00:28:45,070
I am now the driver. My displacement now is in inches, not a force but is in inches.

306
00:28:53,310 --> 00:29:06,220
And here is the object, but I am going to move my hand in a way η (see the blackboard).

307
00:29:06,220 --> 00:29:12,880
That is the frequency that I decide. I impose that frequency on the top of that pendulum.

308
00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:19,000
And the amplitude of my hands in terms of inches or miles or light years,

309
00:29:19,000 --> 00:29:24,910
that is a linear scale η0. This is not a force.

310
00:29:24,910 --> 00:29:28,660
This is not a force. It's displacement.

311
00:29:28,660 --> 00:29:33,380
While I take a picture at one moment in time, and what do I see.

312
00:29:33,380 --> 00:29:37,900
I see that this is what the pendulum looks like.

313
00:29:37,900 --> 00:29:46,330
This angle is θ. The pendulum is displaced over a distance x from equilibrium.

314
00:29:46,330 --> 00:29:52,090
And the top is displaced over a distance η. This is walter Lewin.

315
00:29:52,090 --> 00:29:55,380
I am doing that. I am there with my hands. I can't help it.

316
00:29:55,380 --> 00:30:01,370
This is where I am and this is where the object is.

317
00:30:01,370 --> 00:30:06,480
So now I want to put in all the forces that I have worked.

318
00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:11,740
I will move it up a little bit because I want to have a little bit room for my forces.

319
00:30:11,740 --> 00:30:19,360
So makes the length a little shorter. So here's the object and here's the object.

320
00:30:19,360 --> 00:30:23,530
There are only two forces on this object.

321
00:30:23,530 --> 00:30:35,960
And that is gravity which is mg. And that is the tension. There is nothing else.

322
00:30:35,960 --> 00:30:48,440
I call this x equal 0 and I call this displacement x away from equilibrium.

323
00:30:48,440 --> 00:30:56,410
For small angles, I want to argue that T is very close to mg.

324
00:30:56,410 --> 00:30:59,040
For one thing if you hold them vertically and you do nothing,

325
00:30:59,040 --> 00:31:02,280
and there is no motion. It's obvious that T is mg.

326
00:31:02,280 --> 00:31:06,430
Two forces have to cancel each other. That's clear.

327
00:31:06,430 --> 00:31:13,640
But I can show you that even if the angles are modest that that should also be the case.

328
00:31:13,640 --> 00:31:23,970
Suppose I decompose T in two directions: vertical direction, so this is T times

329
00:31:23,970 --> 00:31:33,620
the cosθ, and the horizontal direction, so this is T times the sinθ.

330
00:31:33,620 --> 00:31:38,660
If the angles are very small, the object is hardly moving at all in this direction.

331
00:31:38,660 --> 00:31:41,830
The motion is almost exclusively in this direction.

332
00:31:41,830 --> 00:31:45,530
So that is no acceleration in the Y direction

333
00:31:45,530 --> 00:31:50,630
or I should say the acceleration in the Y direction is negligibly small.

334
00:31:50,630 --> 00:31:57,720
So that means to high degree of accuracy, Tcosθ is always the same as mg.

335
00:31:57,720 --> 00:32:07,850
High degree of accuracy. But for small angles cosθ itself is one, therefore T equals mg.

336
00:32:07,310 --> 00:32:15,490
And so the force that is driving this object back to equilibrium is Tsinθ,

337
00:32:15,490 --> 00:32:22,690
and so that force is mgsinθ to a high degree of accuracy.

338
00:32:22,690 --> 00:32:28,610
I'm going to introduce again that γ is b/m thought of its damping.

339
00:32:28,610 --> 00:32:34,000
And I am going to introduce that ωo squared equals g/l,

340
00:32:34,000 --> 00:32:35,990
ωo squared is g/l,

341
00:32:35,990 --> 00:32:40,400
g/l being the ... the square root of g/l being the

342
00:32:40,400 --> 00:32:48,110
resonance frequency of a pendulum length l, independent of

343
00:32:48,110 --> 00:32:51,880
the mass of the object as we have seen before.

344
00:32:51,880 --> 00:32:55,320
So now I'm going to write down Newton's Second Law,

345
00:32:55,320 --> 00:33:00,650
so I get m x double dot,

346
00:33:00,650 --> 00:33:09,050
then I get minus b x dot, that is the damping, minus b x dot,

347
00:33:09,050 --> 00:33:13,420
and now comes this force which is the only one that

348
00:33:13,420 --> 00:33:16,800
wants to drive it back to equilibrium.

349
00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:18,840
It's the restoring force.

350
00:33:18,840 --> 00:33:22,370
And so that's force if you accept my t being mg,

351
00:33:22,370 --> 00:33:27,570
that is mg times the sin of θ.

352
00:33:27,570 --> 00:33:34,380
That's the differential equation that I now have to solve.

353
00:33:34,380 --> 00:33:40,010
That is a driven system. Now here I had a driven system

354
00:33:40,010 --> 00:33:47,530
and boy, I saw force here. I don't see anything like that there.

355
00:33:47,530 --> 00:33:50,970
Where on earth does Walter Lewin come into this picture?

356
00:33:50,970 --> 00:34:04,620
Who is doing something? Have I overlook myself perhaps?

357
00:34:04,620 --> 00:34:11,730
Excuse me...I changed nothing. Would I change anything?

358
00:34:11,730 --> 00:34:15,440
I've changed nothing, but I don't see myself anymore.

359
00:34:15,440 --> 00:34:18,260
So what's wrong? Is there anything wrong with this?

360
00:34:18,260 --> 00:34:23,610
Where do I show up in this equation?

361
00:34:23,610 --> 00:34:30,070
So where in that equation do I show up?

362
00:34:30,070 --> 00:34:39,410
What is the sin of θ? What is the sin of θ?

363
00:34:39,410 --> 00:34:43,960
What is the sin of this angle?

364
00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:54,370
x minus η, that's Walter Lewin. x minus η divided by l.

365
00:34:54,370 --> 00:34:56,920
There I am.

366
00:34:56,920 --> 00:34:59,090
And so I'm going to substitute that in here,

367
00:34:59,090 --> 00:35:02,510
and I'm going to divide that by m.

368
00:35:02,510 --> 00:35:07,020
Well, let's not divide by m yet. Let’s just say x double dot,

369
00:35:07,020 --> 00:35:17,100
minus b x dot, and now we get minus mg times x/l,

370
00:35:17,100 --> 00:35:19,990
and now we bring Walter Lewin to the other side.

371
00:35:19,990 --> 00:35:30,590
And so we get plus mg times η divided by l,

372
00:35:30,590 --> 00:35:34,510
and η is ηo times cosωt

373
00:35:34,510 --> 00:35:40,690
because I am moving my hand that η is a function of time.

374
00:35:40,690 --> 00:35:45,430
Let me write down an mg in here and then we will check this.

375
00:35:45,430 --> 00:35:50,680
so mg times sinθ has two terms that it has an mg times x/l,

376
00:35:50,680 --> 00:35:53,560
but it also has an mg times η/l.

377
00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:56,030
And I bring that η/l on this side,

378
00:35:56,030 --> 00:35:59,230
but I know that η is changing in time,

379
00:35:59,230 --> 00:36:03,820
and so you see now Walter Lewin is right there.

380
00:36:03,820 --> 00:36:08,660
And now I divide by m and I substitute ωo squared in here.

381
00:36:08,660 --> 00:36:12,030
Oh... I had an m here too.

382
00:36:12,030 --> 00:36:14,260
You should had screamed there wasn't an m there.

383
00:36:14,260 --> 00:36:16,130
Are you decided not to divide by m, remember?

384
00:36:16,130 --> 00:36:22,930
Now I am going to divide by m, so I get x double dot.

385
00:36:22,930 --> 00:36:27,200
There's an equal sign here. You should not be sleeping.

386
00:36:27,200 --> 00:36:29,240
You're not supposed to sleep.

387
00:36:29,240 --> 00:36:36,460
This is an equal sign, minus b x dot, right? Equals minus b, yeah.

388
00:36:36,460 --> 00:36:38,120
We on business now.

389
00:36:38,120 --> 00:36:44,500
And so I'm going to...This should also...You all sleeping.

390
00:36:44,500 --> 00:36:47,370
Why all of you are sleeping? My goodness.

391
00:36:47,370 --> 00:36:51,310
m x double dot, minus b x dot, minus mg kx/l,

392
00:36:51,310 --> 00:36:55,090
and then the minus and the minus becomes plus.

393
00:36:55,090 --> 00:36:58,220
Right? Try not to sleep.

394
00:36:58,220 --> 00:37:04,080
So x double dot, now we get plus γ times x dot,

395
00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:10,420
now we get plus ωo squared times because g / l is ωo squared,

396
00:37:10,420 --> 00:37:13,610
times x, so I divide the m out,

397
00:37:13,610 --> 00:37:24,030
and now I get equals ωo squared times ηo times cosωt.

398
00:37:24,030 --> 00:37:27,350
I will move this l up a teeny little bit,

399
00:37:27,350 --> 00:37:31,460
and I'm going to look now at that equation at the bottom.

400
00:37:31,460 --> 00:37:38,290
And I'm now overjoyed happiness,

401
00:37:38,290 --> 00:37:43,310
because this one looks almost like a carbon copy

402
00:37:43,310 --> 00:37:50,160
of the one that I had here with an Focosωt.

403
00:37:50,160 --> 00:37:59,380
And now instead of an Fo divided by m cosωt, I now have this.

404
00:37:59,380 --> 00:38:04,380
so this takes the place of my earlier Fo divided by m,

405
00:38:04,380 --> 00:38:07,980
Fo divided by m is an acceleration by the way.

406
00:38:07,980 --> 00:38:10,950
Now better be an acceleration because this is an acceleration,

407
00:38:10,950 --> 00:38:12,720
and apples have to be apples.

408
00:38:12,720 --> 00:38:15,400
so this is an acceleration, this is an acceleration,

409
00:38:15,400 --> 00:38:18,170
and this is also an acceleration,

410
00:38:18,170 --> 00:38:20,880
multiply ωo squared by distance,

411
00:38:20,880 --> 00:38:23,830
then you get distance divided by time squared.

412
00:38:23,830 --> 00:38:27,860
So you see now how the connection between the two go.

413
00:38:27,860 --> 00:38:33,320
Where originally I got an Fo/m times cosωt.

414
00:38:33,320 --> 00:38:35,610
Now because Walter Lewin's motion,

415
00:38:35,610 --> 00:38:40,890
I'm going to get an ωo squared times ηo.

416
00:38:40,890 --> 00:38:41,710
And so you see now

417
00:38:41,710 --> 00:38:49,500
how this motion of my hands indeed translate into a force on the object.

418
00:38:49,500 --> 00:38:52,600
Well, I have the solution. I don't have to do anything.

419
00:38:52,600 --> 00:38:57,500
All I have to do is change this by ωo squared times ηo,

420
00:38:57,500 --> 00:39:02,910
and I'm done. Differential equations are identical.

421
00:39:02,910 --> 00:39:06,300
I don't even have to change the tangent of δ. Nothing changes.

422
00:39:06,300 --> 00:39:08,940
This is the only thing that changes.

423
00:39:08,940 --> 00:39:15,780
So we are done. We can now make some predictions.

424
00:39:15,780 --> 00:39:19,990
The prediction is that if I'm going to shake this pendulum,

425
00:39:19,990 --> 00:39:25,570
and I'm going to do that very slowly, taking one hour to go to the left,

426
00:39:25,570 --> 00:39:29,240
and taking one hour to the right, and if my amplitude is ηo,

427
00:39:29,240 --> 00:39:34,810
what do you think that the amplitude A,

428
00:39:34,810 --> 00:39:37,760
the solution of my differential equation will be?

429
00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:40,920
Another words, I'm going to shake very slowly.

430
00:39:40,920 --> 00:39:45,410
What do you think A will be without looking at the differential equation?

431
00:39:45,410 --> 00:39:47,130
So I just go with my hands like this.

432
00:39:47,130 --> 00:39:52,760
Amplitude ηo, amplitude ηo, and I do it very slowly.

433
00:39:52,760 --> 00:39:57,890
What will be the amplitude of A? ηo.

434
00:39:57,890 --> 00:40:02,250
So you expect that this goes to ηo.

435
00:40:02,250 --> 00:40:05,120
If you don't believe it, go to this equation,

436
00:40:05,120 --> 00:40:08,210
substitute in here 0, in here 0, you get ωo squared,

437
00:40:08,210 --> 00:40:11,500
each of these ωo squared, you see ηo.

438
00:40:11,500 --> 00:40:14,060
Exactly what that equation predicts,

439
00:40:14,060 --> 00:40:16,810
but your common sense says the same thing.

440
00:40:16,810 --> 00:40:18,560
Now what do you think δ is

441
00:40:18,560 --> 00:40:23,030
if I'm going to move this pendulum very slowly to the left and to the right.

442
00:40:23,030 --> 00:40:25,940
Of course. Of course your object will follow me.

443
00:40:25,940 --> 00:40:28,770
We will be ridiculous if I take one week to go from here to here,

444
00:40:28,770 --> 00:40:32,510
the object will be there, right? Obviously the object is always here.

445
00:40:32,510 --> 00:40:36,350
So you also predict that δ is 0.

446
00:40:36,350 --> 00:40:41,670
And so now we can make a quick prediction that at resonance

447
00:40:41,670 --> 00:40:47,570
you probably get Q times ηo, and then δ will become π/2.

448
00:40:47,570 --> 00:40:52,850
And when you go to very high frequency, then A will go to zero,

449
00:40:52,850 --> 00:41:00,130
and then δ will go to pi. And this is what I want to demonstrate to you.

450
00:41:00,130 --> 00:41:06,100
So the final solution of this pendulum, which I will write down in red,

451
00:41:06,100 --> 00:41:13,250
is going to be that x equals A times cos of ωt minus δ,

452
00:41:13,250 --> 00:41:15,980
just as we had before A is none negotiable,

453
00:41:15,980 --> 00:41:17,940
has nothing to do with the initial conditions.

454
00:41:17,940 --> 00:41:21,820
δ is none negotiable, has nothing to do with initial conditions.

455
00:41:21,820 --> 00:41:26,770
This is the steady state solution.

456
00:41:26,770 --> 00:41:35,350
Alright, let me take my shoes off because then you can see it better.

457
00:41:35,350 --> 00:41:43,840
Alright. Here is a pendulum.

458
00:41:43,840 --> 00:41:46,790
It could be very exciting, I'm going to tell you.

459
00:41:46,790 --> 00:41:53,670
I'm going to move this with ω very close to 0. Very exciting.

460
00:41:53,670 --> 00:42:04,050
I'm doing it right now. Aren't you thrilled? No, you are not thrilled.

461
00:42:04,050 --> 00:42:11,860
But I'm moving and now I'm going to go back.

462
00:42:11,860 --> 00:42:15,190
Do you agree that A the amplitude of that object

463
00:42:15,190 --> 00:42:18,640
is exactly the same as the amplitude of my hand?

464
00:42:18,640 --> 00:42:21,230
Do you agree? Do you see that? That is why that A is ηo,

465
00:42:21,230 --> 00:42:24,960
and that follows from that rather complicated equation.

466
00:42:24,960 --> 00:42:27,670
Did you see that δ was 0?

467
00:42:27,670 --> 00:42:32,580
Did you see that we went hand in hand, so to speak no pun implied.

468
00:42:32,580 --> 00:42:34,310
We're going hand in hand, right?

469
00:42:34,310 --> 00:42:38,320
That one follows exactly my hands, for δ is 0.

470
00:42:38,320 --> 00:42:43,860
Let's now go to high frequency, very high frequency, way above resonance.

471
00:42:43,860 --> 00:42:47,250
And what you see now is that the object is not moving very much,

472
00:42:47,250 --> 00:42:48,690
but if you look very carefully,

473
00:42:48,690 --> 00:42:53,300
you'll see when my hand is here, the object tends to go there.

474
00:42:53,300 --> 00:42:55,130
And when my hand is here, the object tends to go there.

475
00:42:55,130 --> 00:43:04,800
That is that pi. Ready? You see that there is almost no motion,

476
00:43:04,800 --> 00:43:05,980
A is near zero,

477
00:43:05,980 --> 00:43:09,030
but can you really see that

478
00:43:09,030 --> 00:43:12,610
the phase differences by... can you that 180 degrees?

479
00:43:12,610 --> 00:43:15,740
You see if the A is exactly zero, of course that you can not tell,

480
00:43:15,740 --> 00:43:18,030
so I'm trying not to go infinitely fast,

481
00:43:18,030 --> 00:43:21,740
I go a little slower than infinitely fast.

482
00:43:21,740 --> 00:43:25,710
Can you see it? Ok, now comes the resonance.

483
00:43:25,710 --> 00:43:30,110
And now it will be very difficult to see this π/2.

484
00:43:30,110 --> 00:43:31,010
That's almost impossible.

485
00:43:31,010 --> 00:43:33,090
That's not my objective

486
00:43:33,090 --> 00:43:39,660
but my objective is to show you that enormously small, very small ηo here

487
00:43:39,660 --> 00:43:43,730
will give an amplitude there which is Q times higher.

488
00:43:43,730 --> 00:43:45,700
So you get a huge swing

489
00:43:45,700 --> 00:43:49,800
when my hand is hardly moving at all. That's the power of Q.

490
00:43:49,800 --> 00:43:54,710
There we go. First get it into it. There it is.

491
00:43:54,710 --> 00:43:57,810
Now this is resonance. Would you agree this is resonance?

492
00:43:57,810 --> 00:44:01,460
Now look at my hands. My hand is moving

493
00:44:01,460 --> 00:44:07,070
probably no more than with an amplitude of 3mm. No more.

494
00:44:07,070 --> 00:44:10,960
And yet I see an amplitude there of 60cm

495
00:44:10,960 --> 00:44:12,480
that would mean that very roughly

496
00:44:12,480 --> 00:44:19,760
this pendulum has a Q of 200, namely 60cm divided by 3mm.

497
00:44:19,760 --> 00:44:23,310
So this is even a way to make an extremely rough guess,

498
00:44:23,310 --> 00:44:26,450
admittedly very rough, of the Q value.

499
00:44:26,450 --> 00:44:28,260
You can not even see my hand move,

500
00:44:28,260 --> 00:44:31,620
we be honest. You can't even see my hand move

501
00:44:31,620 --> 00:44:34,330
but I know I am moving it a little.

502
00:44:34,330 --> 00:44:40,780
Oh...you're lying...No... you were not...No, you were not.

503
00:44:40,780 --> 00:44:45,570
Ok, so you see all the goodies that we have calculated actually

504
00:44:45,570 --> 00:44:51,300
can be demonstrated and show up quite dramatically.

505
00:44:51,300 --> 00:44:57,030
Suppose I have a spring system like this

506
00:44:57,030 --> 00:45:02,210
and I want the force on that object here.

507
00:45:02,210 --> 00:45:05,060
Well, what I can do is just to shake it here

508
00:45:05,060 --> 00:45:09,560
in the way extremely similar to what I did there.

509
00:45:09,560 --> 00:45:14,060
And when I shake it there, we can make certain predictions.

510
00:45:14,060 --> 00:45:18,830
We can make predictions now based on the knowledge that we have.

511
00:45:18,830 --> 00:45:24,800
Suppose I shake it with an amplitude ηo,

512
00:45:24,800 --> 00:45:27,280
no differential equations...no...nothing for now.

513
00:45:27,280 --> 00:45:31,800
But I know that somehow it will come out in terms of the force at the object.

514
00:45:31,800 --> 00:45:34,590
So I know that when I write down the differential equation,

515
00:45:34,590 --> 00:45:36,440
of course it shows up exactly this way,

516
00:45:36,440 --> 00:45:42,750
I get an ωo squared times ηo, except the ωo squared is now k over m.

517
00:45:42,750 --> 00:45:46,210
So what do you think if I shake it as ω equal 0,

518
00:45:46,210 --> 00:45:51,740
what is then the amplitude that this object will have

519
00:45:51,740 --> 00:45:56,590
relative to my motion ηo?

520
00:45:56,590 --> 00:46:03,360
I move my hands. ηo infinitely long. What will this object do?

521
00:46:03,360 --> 00:46:10,090
We just follow it. So you get this answer. What will be the δ?

522
00:46:10,090 --> 00:46:11,340
It will be 0.

523
00:46:11,340 --> 00:46:15,690
When I had the resonance, what will be the amplitude of that object

524
00:46:15,690 --> 00:46:19,620
hanging from the spring? Will be q times higher than my ηo.

525
00:46:19,620 --> 00:46:22,170
What will be the phase difference? 90 degrees.

526
00:46:22,170 --> 00:46:25,520
When I shake like crazy, A will go to 0.

527
00:46:25,520 --> 00:46:27,960
So with this spring,

528
00:46:27,960 --> 00:46:31,040
if you shake it like this, which is part of your problem set,

529
00:46:31,040 --> 00:46:36,480
you will see exactly the same result that we have there done for a pendulum.

530
00:46:36,480 --> 00:46:44,150
And this now, I want to independently demonstrate to you.

531
00:46:44,150 --> 00:46:46,780
I have here an air track.

532
00:46:46,780 --> 00:46:50,430
I can blow out air, so that the object here starts floating,

533
00:46:50,430 --> 00:46:55,260
so we can make the damping very small by making it float.

534
00:46:55,260 --> 00:47:00,930
But if we lower the air flow, the damping becomes a little higher.

535
00:47:00,930 --> 00:47:03,670
I have a spring here with spring constant k

536
00:47:03,670 --> 00:47:07,390
and I have another spring here with spring constant k.

537
00:47:07,390 --> 00:47:12,350
They both have spring constant k.

538
00:47:12,350 --> 00:47:14,880
And now I'm going to drive this here

539
00:47:14,880 --> 00:47:28,490
at an extremely low frequency over a distance ηo at maximum. ηocosωt.

540
00:47:28,490 --> 00:47:31,600
What do you think the amplitude of this object will be?

541
00:47:31,600 --> 00:47:42,100
At that very low...Yeah....very very good...very good

542
00:47:42,100 --> 00:47:46,740
Not ηo, but why is it half? Because we have 2 springs.

543
00:47:46,740 --> 00:47:50,840
So effectively the spring constant is twice that. Exactly.

544
00:47:50,840 --> 00:47:57,780
So if I go very slowly, you will see that this displacement here

545
00:47:57,780 --> 00:48:00,510
will be twice as high as this displacement.

546
00:48:00,510 --> 00:48:02,570
But what I really want to show you is

547
00:48:02,570 --> 00:48:04,510
they are in phase.

548
00:48:04,510 --> 00:48:09,280
This one will go to the right when this one goes to the right.

549
00:48:09,280 --> 00:48:14,720
Now comes the catch. I showed you earlier that this is steady state solution.

550
00:48:14,720 --> 00:48:21,380
In the beginning, the system doesn't like me. It hates me. It fights me.

551
00:48:21,380 --> 00:48:23,020
It doesn't like that ω.

552
00:48:23,020 --> 00:48:27,850
It wants to do something different which is part of next week's lecture.

553
00:48:27,850 --> 00:48:30,580
And you will see that in the beginning

554
00:48:30,580 --> 00:48:35,820
and so we have to be a little patient before my will survives.

555
00:48:35,820 --> 00:48:37,070
Ready for that?

556
00:48:37,070 --> 00:48:40,060
So I am going to start now to drive the system

557
00:48:40,060 --> 00:48:43,060
at the frequency which is below resonance.

558
00:48:43,060 --> 00:48:45,910
I want you to see two things that they go hand in hand,

559
00:48:45,910 --> 00:48:49,180
and I want you to see that the...

560
00:48:49,180 --> 00:48:53,370
you're going to very low frequency.

561
00:48:53,370 --> 00:48:54,500
I will give you the amplitude....here,

562
00:48:54,500 --> 00:48:56,860
This is twice the amplitude of the driver.

563
00:48:56,860 --> 00:49:00,610
Now it is here the spring and now the spring is here.

564
00:49:00,610 --> 00:49:04,020
So it's only... this much is 2ηo.

565
00:49:04,020 --> 00:49:07,340
So ηo is no more than 3 quarter of an inch.

566
00:49:07,340 --> 00:49:17,770
And now we are going to let that object be exposed to this driver,

567
00:49:17,770 --> 00:49:24,330
and we will give it a little bit of time to recognize me.

568
00:49:24,330 --> 00:49:29,440
It takes a little bit of time to reach the steady state solution.

569
00:49:29,440 --> 00:49:35,050
And next time we will learn how much time it actually takes.

570
00:49:35,050 --> 00:49:38,590
So if you wanna be a little bit patient,

571
00:49:38,590 --> 00:49:49,030
and you will see. If we give it too much damping,

572
00:49:49,030 --> 00:49:59,030
too little air, then of course it starts to get stuck.

573
00:49:59,030 --> 00:50:02,980
Yaaa, we close. We are close, for me, close enough.

574
00:50:02,980 --> 00:50:06,680
Now look at it. They are going both to the left for me.

575
00:50:06,680 --> 00:50:08,800
Both to the right for me.

576
00:50:08,800 --> 00:50:11,490
For you, they are going now both to the right,

577
00:50:11,490 --> 00:50:13,670
and going both to the left,

578
00:50:13,670 --> 00:50:17,080
going both to the right, and both to the

579
00:50:17,080 --> 00:50:19,280
er er, and both to the left.

580
00:50:19,280 --> 00:50:22,330
Now this was the amplitude,

581
00:50:22,330 --> 00:50:24,740
twice the amplitude of the driver.

582
00:50:24,740 --> 00:50:27,440
And when you look carefully here, it's less.

583
00:50:27,440 --> 00:50:32,170
This is that ηo zero over two, that this gentleman immediately notice,

584
00:50:32,170 --> 00:50:34,930
because we have two springs.

585
00:50:34,930 --> 00:50:40,060
So you see here, apart from the factor of two, you see the delta zero

586
00:50:40,060 --> 00:50:44,980
and you see that the amplitude indeed is half of the amplitude of the driver

587
00:50:44,980 --> 00:50:46,940
because of the two springs.

588
00:50:46,940 --> 00:50:59,040
Now we are going to resonance ωo and now nasty things may happen.

589
00:51:01,960 --> 00:51:11,820
It may break. We have to give it time. You see what funny things it's doing.

590
00:51:11,820 --> 00:51:18,350
Not the steady state yet, have to wait.

591
00:51:22,450 --> 00:51:24,940
Just a little patient.

592
00:51:40,940 --> 00:51:43,920
Give it more time.

593
00:51:53,840 --> 00:51:57,360
Now it is also that the... remember this is only moving this much.

594
00:51:57,360 --> 00:52:00,880
Look how much this is moving.

595
00:52:03,000 --> 00:52:06,090
I may even be exactly at resonance.

596
00:52:06,090 --> 00:52:18,920
We can only do the best we can here, may not be exactly at resonance.

597
00:52:20,630 --> 00:52:22,650
Oh, boy. Close to resonance now.

598
00:52:22,650 --> 00:52:28,030
Oh, yeah! Oh, ah, look at that!

599
00:52:28,030 --> 00:52:30,840
Oh! Am I at resonance?

600
00:52:30,840 --> 00:52:32,490
I think I got it, then you see?

601
00:52:32,490 --> 00:52:34,920
They're neither in phase nor out of phase.

602
00:52:34,920 --> 00:52:36,600
Now you see the 90 degrees.

603
00:52:36,600 --> 00:52:39,260
Look at this teeny weeny little displacement here

604
00:52:39,260 --> 00:52:41,720
and look what this man is doing.

605
00:52:41,720 --> 00:52:49,840
That is resonance. Markable! Ah! Marcos, where's Marcos?

606
00:52:49,840 --> 00:52:55,340
We hit it. Right on!

607
00:52:55,340 --> 00:53:00,530
Now I will oscillate it way over resonance.

608
00:53:00,530 --> 00:53:04,010
Not way but over resonance.

609
00:53:04,010 --> 00:53:08,500
First, but first have the system first come down.

610
00:53:08,500 --> 00:53:11,400
Now I will change the frequency above resonance

611
00:53:11,400 --> 00:53:14,670
so that now you will see the phenomenon that

612
00:53:14,670 --> 00:53:21,280
I discussed earlier that the amplitude is very small.

613
00:53:21,280 --> 00:53:24,260
Again we have to wait a little, look how fast it is going

614
00:53:24,260 --> 00:53:36,080
and that they will go 180 degrees out of phase.

615
00:53:36,080 --> 00:53:40,850
Now look, this is going this much. Huh? Back and forth.

616
00:53:40,850 --> 00:53:45,820
This one not doing very much.

617
00:53:45,820 --> 00:53:49,060
Now you can see it I can. It float like this

618
00:53:49,060 --> 00:53:50,840
chi chi chi chi... Can you see it?

619
00:53:50,840 --> 00:53:53,580
That is 180 degrees out of phases.

620
00:53:53,580 --> 00:53:58,510
Very clear. 5 minutes break.

621
00:53:58,510 --> 00:53:59,960
See you back here in exactly 5 minutes.

622
00:54:03,360 --> 00:54:07,170
Now so we have discussed today some simple systems:

623
00:54:07,170 --> 00:54:13,930
pendulum one object, springs one object, one resonance frequency.

624
00:54:13,930 --> 00:54:16,010
But soon in 803

625
00:54:16,010 --> 00:54:20,590
we will discuss systems with more than one objects.

626
00:54:20,590 --> 00:54:23,360
For instance, if I put three cars on here

627
00:54:23,360 --> 00:54:27,600
with four springs three resonance frequencies.

628
00:54:27,600 --> 00:54:31,050
If I have a triple pendulum which I'll demonstrate next week.

629
00:54:31,050 --> 00:54:33,750
One pendulum with all the other below,

630
00:54:33,750 --> 00:54:35,880
the other three resonance frequencies.

631
00:54:35,880 --> 00:54:39,840
Five cars on there, five resonance frequencies.

632
00:54:39,840 --> 00:54:45,910
So simple objects like a dinner plate or just a regular glass

633
00:54:45,910 --> 00:54:49,070
has enormous number of resonance frequencies.

634
00:54:49,070 --> 00:54:56,240
It can oscillate in many many different ways.

635
00:54:56,240 --> 00:55:00,320
If you drive your car, your wheels turn around.

636
00:55:00,320 --> 00:55:05,450
That's certain oscillation, a certain period underlying.

637
00:55:05,450 --> 00:55:06,500
And you may notice that

638
00:55:06,500 --> 00:55:09,560
at certain speed that something in your car begins to rattle.

639
00:55:09,560 --> 00:55:10,900
They're annoying.

640
00:55:10,900 --> 00:55:14,130
All you have to do is go a little slower

641
00:55:14,130 --> 00:55:16,090
or go a little faster and it stops.

642
00:55:16,090 --> 00:55:19,950
You go off resonance for that object.

643
00:55:19,950 --> 00:55:23,320
Now you may go on resonance for another object, of course.

644
00:55:23,320 --> 00:55:29,250
And some cars rattle at any speed.

645
00:55:29,250 --> 00:55:30,820
You have a radiator in your room

646
00:55:30,820 --> 00:55:34,660
which rotates that is also underlying oscillation and a period.

647
00:55:34,660 --> 00:55:40,100
That may start to cause resonance in the frame

648
00:55:40,100 --> 00:55:42,700
you may hear some awful noise sometimes.

649
00:55:42,700 --> 00:55:46,970
Unfortuntely these fans you cannot change this speed so easily,

650
00:55:46,970 --> 00:55:50,110
but you can go from state three to two to one

651
00:55:50,110 --> 00:55:52,820
and then this terrible noise will go away.

652
00:55:52,820 --> 00:55:55,330
You take a washing-machine or dryer.

653
00:55:55,330 --> 00:55:58,370
I used to remember a friend of mine in the Netherlands had a dryer

654
00:55:58,370 --> 00:56:00,870
and when he started the dryer,

655
00:56:00,870 --> 00:56:03,550
at very early phase when it works at the certain frequency

656
00:56:03,550 --> 00:56:06,800
the whole dryer would start to walk through the room.

657
00:56:06,800 --> 00:56:08,090
It walked.

658
00:56:08,090 --> 00:56:11,170
And then at higher frequency, it of course would stop.

659
00:56:11,170 --> 00:56:14,280
Resonance. Resonances are everywhere

660
00:56:14,280 --> 00:56:18,530
and they often occur when you don't expect them.

661
00:56:18,530 --> 00:56:20,530
You open a faucet.

662
00:56:20,530 --> 00:56:23,680
You think it is a steady stream of water which I am sure it is.

663
00:56:23,680 --> 00:56:24,910
But sometimes you hear,

664
00:56:24,910 --> 00:56:28,760
ahhhhh, an unbelievable sound that drives you almost nuts.

665
00:56:28,760 --> 00:56:30,640
I am sure all of you have heard that sometimes.

666
00:56:30,640 --> 00:56:33,700
If it isn't in dormitory may be at the hotels or at the home.

667
00:56:33,700 --> 00:56:36,850
All you have to do is open the faucet a little more or a little less,

668
00:56:36,850 --> 00:56:40,440
and it goes away.

669
00:56:40,440 --> 00:56:44,470
And it is really extremely loud at an annoying resonance.

670
00:56:44,470 --> 00:56:47,090
If you take something as simple as a wine glass

671
00:56:47,090 --> 00:56:50,630
which has a tremendous number of resonances,

672
00:56:50,630 --> 00:56:56,240
then I can make you listen to a well-known resonance

673
00:56:56,240 --> 00:56:59,500
which is by rubbing the rim of glass.

674
00:56:59,500 --> 00:57:00,900
When I rub the rim of the glass,

675
00:57:00,900 --> 00:57:04,700
I am not exciting it at one particular frequency.

676
00:57:04,700 --> 00:57:06,740
Sure we know that resonance frequency.

677
00:57:06,740 --> 00:57:09,760
I am exciting it at lots and lots of frequencies,

678
00:57:09,760 --> 00:57:13,240
I dump on it the whole spectrum of frequencies.

679
00:57:13,240 --> 00:57:14,880
But the glass is mean.

680
00:57:14,880 --> 00:57:18,080
It just picks out the one which is its resonance.

681
00:57:18,080 --> 00:57:22,260
That's where builds up a large value for A. It ignores all the others.

682
00:57:22,260 --> 00:57:27,360
And that's why I can make it resonate at that particular frequency.

683
00:57:27,360 --> 00:57:31,620
Listen to it.

684
00:57:34,640 --> 00:57:36,930
This is not one frequency what I am doing

685
00:57:36,930 --> 00:57:39,220
and has nothing to do with the time that for me to go around.

686
00:57:39,220 --> 00:57:44,480
It's a very high pitch about 420 Hz.

687
00:57:44,480 --> 00:57:49,430
So the rubbing is like dumping a spectrum of frequencies on it

688
00:57:49,430 --> 00:57:53,640
and it selects what it likes the most.

689
00:57:53,640 --> 00:57:59,050
When I was a student I remember we often had a after-dinner speaker.

690
00:57:59,050 --> 00:58:03,260
We had dinners at. For alternative, we don't have after-dinner speaker.

691
00:58:03,260 --> 00:58:06,470
And more often than not we didn't like the after-dinner speaker.

692
00:58:06,470 --> 00:58:08,510
We didn't like the speech.

693
00:58:08,510 --> 00:58:10,070
and so we make that very clear

694
00:58:10,070 --> 00:58:14,730
and the way we did that is all our wine glasses.

695
00:58:14,730 --> 00:58:18,280
An enormous sound in that dining-hall

696
00:58:18,280 --> 00:58:22,480
and the speaker very quickly got the message, of course.

697
00:58:22,480 --> 00:58:24,960
That's the enormous sound you can generate.

698
00:58:24,960 --> 00:58:28,280
And most of these wine glasses were roughly the same.

699
00:58:28,280 --> 00:58:32,910
So it was always a tone that was loud

700
00:58:32,910 --> 00:58:37,050
and clear and almost one frequency.

701
00:58:37,050 --> 00:58:42,310
You've seen Fuddys(?) lately of the storms, 3 storms in a row.

702
00:58:42,310 --> 00:58:45,240
And you must remember sometimes that you saw traffic sign.

703
00:58:45,240 --> 00:58:47,650
Here a pole then the traffic sign

704
00:58:47,650 --> 00:58:51,590
and then even though some kind of a crazy wind going,

705
00:58:51,590 --> 00:58:53,080
the traffic sigh goes like this

706
00:58:53,080 --> 00:58:58,600
"chi", "piii". All resonance frequencies.

707
00:58:58,600 --> 00:59:00,330
It can't even break.

708
00:59:00,330 --> 00:59:04,770
Even though the wind appears to be relatively steady.

709
00:59:04,770 --> 00:59:09,480
The wind then generates in a way a whole spectrum of frequencies

710
00:59:09,480 --> 00:59:13,160
and this traffic sigh picks out the one that it likes the most.

711
00:59:13,160 --> 00:59:16,470
And then it goes nuts at a frequency.

712
00:59:16,470 --> 00:59:17,550
That is a resonance frequency.

713
00:59:17,550 --> 00:59:21,080
And resonances can become destructive, of course

714
00:59:21,080 --> 00:59:23,590
if these amplitudes are too high,

715
00:59:23,590 --> 00:59:26,830
then things can break down you may have noticed I was worried here

716
00:59:26,830 --> 00:59:29,390
when the amplitude became so large that

717
00:59:29,390 --> 00:59:35,670
this spring might even break or the car might jump off that track.

718
00:59:35,670 --> 00:59:40,870
And of course, a classic example of this destructive resonance is

719
00:59:40,870 --> 00:59:46,210
the destruction of a very famous bridge in this country in 1940.

720
00:59:46,210 --> 00:59:52,340
Then the Tacoma Narrow's Bridge, washington state, was destroyed by wind.

721
00:59:52,340 --> 00:59:55,590
And this bridge has many different resonance frequencies,

722
00:59:55,590 --> 00:59:58,080
one like this and some like this,

723
00:59:58,080 --> 01:00:01,340
depending upon the wind's ranks, different resonances

724
01:00:01,340 --> 01:00:04,520
were excited at different moments in time.

725
01:00:04,520 --> 01:00:07,250
But it ultimately led to the destruction of the bridge.

726
01:00:07,250 --> 01:00:11,840
Now most of you have seen this movie, but just for the few who haven't,

727
01:00:11,840 --> 01:00:13,610
I really want you to see this movie.

728
01:00:13,610 --> 01:00:16,050
You cannot go through MIT

729
01:00:16,050 --> 01:00:22,660
and not having seen the destruction of the Tacoma Bridge movie.

730
01:00:29,370 --> 01:00:31,400
There are countries

731
01:00:31,400 --> 01:00:35,980
where soldiers are not allowed to cross a bridge

732
01:00:35,980 --> 01:00:39,410
when they are marching in step.

733
01:00:39,410 --> 01:00:41,910
That's the case in the Netherlands, my home country.

734
01:00:41,910 --> 01:00:44,650
It's also the case in many European countries.

735
01:00:44,650 --> 01:00:48,430
The story has it as in England, I think, more than 100 years ago

736
01:00:48,430 --> 01:00:51,360
when soldiers went over the bridge in step,

737
01:00:51,360 --> 01:00:54,490
that the bridge collapsed.

738
01:00:54,490 --> 01:00:56,190
Whether that was the result of the soiders

739
01:00:56,190 --> 01:01:00,400
we'll never know, but in any case from those they scan the order,

740
01:01:00,400 --> 01:01:07,610
that soldiers have to go out of step before they cross the bridge.

741
01:01:07,610 --> 01:01:11,780
There is a rumor that most of you have heard that

742
01:01:11,780 --> 01:01:16,560
there are women who are capable of singing

743
01:01:16,560 --> 01:01:21,390
with such a loud voice they can break a wine glass.

744
01:01:21,390 --> 01:01:23,520
They have to tone exactly at the frequency,

745
01:01:23,520 --> 01:01:26,130
the resonance frequency of the wine glass,

746
01:01:26,130 --> 01:01:33,760
and they come out huge volume and the glass breaks.

747
01:01:33,760 --> 01:01:38,440
I don't believe it, but it's a rumor.

748
01:01:38,440 --> 01:01:41,600
There was a commercial many years ago,

749
01:01:41,600 --> 01:01:43,510
some of you may never have seen it,

750
01:01:43,510 --> 01:01:46,150
for Memorax (brand name).

751
01:01:46,150 --> 01:01:48,570
Memorax was a tape,

752
01:01:48,570 --> 01:01:52,440
a special tape for audio tape recorders.

753
01:01:52,440 --> 01:01:55,170
This guy is going to a concert

754
01:01:55,170 --> 01:01:58,550
and there is a woman singing loud voice,

755
01:01:58,550 --> 01:02:04,920
uniform frequency. Bingo! Glass breaks.

756
01:02:04,920 --> 01:02:08,270
He comes home and he tells his wife this story.

757
01:02:08,270 --> 01:02:11,630
Well, his wife was smart enough of course not to believe it.

758
01:02:11,630 --> 01:02:19,100
And he just wanna and just who happens that I recorded it on my Memorax tape.

759
01:02:19,100 --> 01:02:22,490
Well, so he plays the tape at home,

760
01:02:22,490 --> 01:02:26,930
and that moment that the woman's voice goes, what happens,

761
01:02:26,930 --> 01:02:31,970
the glasses break at home in his cabinet.

762
01:02:31,970 --> 01:02:33,820
So much for the physics of Memorax

763
01:02:33,820 --> 01:02:37,450
because you can imagine that the resonance frequency of the glasses at home

764
01:02:37,450 --> 01:02:40,600
were very different than the glasses in the orchestra.

765
01:02:40,600 --> 01:02:44,640
So it is all the swindle but that's, of course, what commercials are all about.

766
01:02:44,640 --> 01:02:48,420
What's now the bottom line?

767
01:02:48,420 --> 01:02:54,180
The bottom line was that if you buy Memorax, these tapes,

768
01:02:54,180 --> 01:02:59,170
then the reproduction is so perfect that

769
01:02:59,170 --> 01:03:07,260
you can even take it home and you see the glasses break.

770
01:03:07,260 --> 01:03:12,980
This brings up now the 64 million dollar question

771
01:03:12,980 --> 01:03:19,040
and that is: can it be done or can it not be done?

772
01:03:19,040 --> 01:03:23,100
So any women in my audience who want to give it a try?

773
01:03:23,100 --> 01:03:26,270
That would be wonderful.

774
01:03:26,270 --> 01:03:28,400
We will ask ourselves that question:

775
01:03:28,400 --> 01:03:31,180
Can this be done or can this not be done by a person?

776
01:03:31,180 --> 01:03:33,560
And I think we came to the conclusion that

777
01:03:33,560 --> 01:03:38,380
the person alone without all kinds of electronic equipments could not do that.

778
01:03:38,380 --> 01:03:40,850
And I still believe that today.

779
01:03:40,850 --> 01:03:44,920
But Prof. Felts, Michael Felts here in MIT,

780
01:03:44,920 --> 01:03:48,400
with one of his graduate students many years ago,

781
01:03:48,400 --> 01:03:52,760
developed some powerful equipment which you see here,

782
01:03:52,760 --> 01:03:58,890
which was designed to make an attempt to break a wine glass.

783
01:03:58,890 --> 01:04:02,340
It doesn't always work, but it works often.

784
01:04:02,340 --> 01:04:05,120
The idea being then that here's the wine glass.

785
01:04:05,120 --> 01:04:08,680
It almost a carbon copy of this one.

786
01:04:08,680 --> 01:04:14,890
When they finally make this do work which near 440Hz.

787
01:04:14,890 --> 01:04:16,070
They went to create a barrow

788
01:04:16,070 --> 01:04:19,660
and they asked how many of these wine glasses do you have?

789
01:04:19,660 --> 01:04:27,040
They said we have 5, 000 and they bought them all 5, 000.

790
01:04:27,040 --> 01:04:29,570
Because it's not obvious if you have to check the glass

791
01:04:29,570 --> 01:04:31,560
that it will ever work again.

792
01:04:31,560 --> 01:04:35,230
And to here with one of those glasses,

793
01:04:35,230 --> 01:04:40,620
here is a loud speaker, the sound comes from this side.

794
01:04:40,620 --> 01:04:43,400
And what is nice about this arrangement?

795
01:04:43,400 --> 01:04:51,820
That we can make you see the distortion of the glass in this resonance mode.

796
01:04:51,820 --> 01:04:54,570
The glass oscillates like this

797
01:04:54,570 --> 01:04:57,670
coz from oval to circular to oval to circular.

798
01:04:57,670 --> 01:04:59,220
And the way we can make you see that

799
01:04:59,220 --> 01:05:04,180
is by strobing the glass at the frequency

800
01:05:04,180 --> 01:05:08,780
which is a little bit different from the frequency of the sound.

801
01:05:08,780 --> 01:05:10,570
Think about it.

802
01:05:10,570 --> 01:05:14,460
Two frequencies almost the same give you a beat phenomenon.

803
01:05:14,460 --> 01:05:16,130
So what that comes down to it?

804
01:05:16,130 --> 01:05:19,670
You see the motion of the glass very slowly.

805
01:05:19,670 --> 01:05:22,170
And then if we hit that resonance frequency,

806
01:05:22,170 --> 01:05:28,540
we will increase the volume, and then maybe it will break.

807
01:05:28,540 --> 01:05:35,560
Now I have to warn you that the sound will be unbearably high.

808
01:05:35,560 --> 01:05:38,680
And so for some of you here in the front row,

809
01:05:38,680 --> 01:05:40,540
you may even want to cover your ears

810
01:05:40,540 --> 01:05:42,040
or you may want to move back.

811
01:05:42,040 --> 01:05:43,420
It is up to you.

812
01:05:43,420 --> 01:05:44,700
But be careful.

813
01:05:44,700 --> 01:05:48,200
This is really an enormously strong signal that they are going to here.

814
01:05:48,200 --> 01:05:50,620
So all be careful. You can move back if you want to.

815
01:05:50,620 --> 01:05:54,960
I have a hearing aids as you have noticed

816
01:05:54,960 --> 01:06:00,310
and I have the option that I can turn them off.

817
01:06:00,310 --> 01:06:03,620
But in spite of that, I am not deaf without them.

818
01:06:03,620 --> 01:06:06,710
I will still cover my ears.

819
01:06:06,710 --> 01:06:12,920
So let me first give you the light setting that we want.

820
01:06:12,920 --> 01:06:22,780
So we make it a little dark and then I will show you the glass.

821
01:06:22,780 --> 01:06:28,410
Oh, I have to change the setting here.

822
01:06:28,410 --> 01:06:32,470
There is the glass. There is no sound. Not oscillating.

823
01:06:32,470 --> 01:06:39,900
Now I turn on the speaker.

824
01:06:39,900 --> 01:06:48,950
So I am now going to turn my hearing aids off and put this on.

825
01:06:48,950 --> 01:06:52,650
And I am going to increase the volume.

826
01:06:52,650 --> 01:06:55,060
And if you doesn't want to break,

827
01:06:55,060 --> 01:06:58,010
I will trend the sound frequency a little bit

828
01:06:58,010 --> 01:07:03,000
to sweep over that resonance curve so that I get onto the maximum.

829
01:07:03,000 --> 01:07:07,250
Because it is only of the Q is so high of this system.

830
01:07:07,250 --> 01:07:09,920
That if I am a little bit off the frequency,

831
01:07:09,920 --> 01:07:14,250
then the amplitude will be low.

832
01:07:14,250 --> 01:07:25,390
For that, let's first see what happens when I increase the volume.

833
01:07:26,350 --> 01:07:29,030
Did I do something wrong?

834
01:07:29,030 --> 01:07:30,400
Yes, I changed the frequency.

835
01:09:03,660 --> 01:09:11,580
I think I have to convince you that a woman cannot do this.

836
01:09:11,580 --> 01:09:16,980
I have some last words of wisdom for you and that is

837
01:09:16,980 --> 01:09:19,930
falling in love is also a form of resonance

838
01:09:19,930 --> 01:09:25,770
and it too can be destructive because it can break you heart.

839
01:09:25,770 --> 01:09:29,360
So try to remember that next time.

840
01:09:29,360 --> 01:09:31,830
Have a good weekend.

 


NameVersionSizeDateUser
03_c.srt1760652/17/06 4:16 AMOOPSSJTU



Last Modified 2/21/06 8:35 AM

Hide Tools